Tag Archives: Liquor Industry India

Bombay High Court Directs Maharashtra to Open Portal for Label Registration

The Bombay High Court has directed the Government of Maharashtra to open the excise department portal for online registration of labels for all alcobev companies, a request filed by the advocates representing the International Spirits and Wines Association of India (ISWAI). This is a temporary directive, pending the hearing of the case filed by ISWAI against the State Government. The next hearing of the case is on December 16. ISWAI went to court, seeking, among other issues, a level playing field in the manufacture of ‘Maharashtra Made Liquor’ (MML).
The Court on November 24 had directed the Government representatives to open the portal for any alcobev player from within the state. However, till December 9, the excise department had not facilitated that process, forcing the Court to take notice of that and cautioning the government. A two-judge bench headed by Senior Judge Revathi Mohite Dere asked why the excise department had not followed the court directive and cautioned the government that it would take serious notice of the lapse.Sources in the Excise Department clarified that the portal is open for anyone to file an application for registering their labels, but it is the department’s prerogative to accept or reject the application.
Only the application for label registration will be accepted once the applicant fits in into the Guideline criteria set by the government. As of now 13 manufacturers are eligible and got the permission to produce MML.

The ISWAI contention has been that the process for companies to get their labels registered is time-consuming, not less than 45 days, and with the court case going on there would be further delay. This, the ISWAI source mentioned would give undue advantage to the eight players who have been granted licenses to set up MML units. They are already marketing MML in the price band of Rs. 160 and Rs. 205 where brand really does not matter to a particular segment of consumers.
As of now, reports from the ground indicate that the products launched under the MML category are doing ‘extremely well’ with product quality being good. Some of the MML players or the consultants who are guiding them come with enormous experience in the liquor industry, either having worked in major companies or having bottling plants or ethanol units. Some of them also own retail shops across Maharashtra where they can give good shelf position for their products.
The ISWAI source said that many of the players were ‘commodity players’ and not ‘brand players’ and they would flood the market having a good lead over the established companies. The source acknowledged that the MML players had drafted consultants who have had strong background in the liquor business and are helping the licensees to set up the businesses, thus giving ‘undue advantage’ to them.
ISWAI went to the court stating that some domestic and international players were producing brands in Maharashtra and selling exclusively in the state and hence should be considered a local player, a criteria to get MML license.
In mid-2025, the Maharashtra government introduced policy changes to incentivise local investment. It brought in the MML category, to include grain-based spirits produced exclusively by local manufacturers. The tax rate for MML is 270 per cent with zero foreign investment/ownership. The government believes that this will spur the local industry.
ISWAI then filed a lawsuit against the Maharashtra government, challenging the sharp hike in excise duty on premium affordable liquor brands and also for exclusion of brands of major players such as Diageo India and Pernod Ricard India from the newly-created lower tax category of MML. ISWAI is represented by Darius Khambatta and Rohan Shah.
The court also asked the government lawyer why the report of the Varsha Nair Committee was not submitted earlier on MML. The report highlights certain salient points to encourage those distilleries which are closed or underutilised in Maharashtra to produce cheap liquor. The report added that this would generate additional revenue to the excise department as well as generate employment provided it is made in Maharashtra for distribution in Maharashtra. It also prescribes certain minimum shareholding pattern for owners.

So far, the department has approved 13 licenses and many more are pending. Companies like Radico Khaitan; Diageo India; Pernod Ricard India and some more are keen on jumping on to this bandwagon to produce economy liquor priced between Rs.160 and Rs.205 for the Maharashtra consumers even while their focus is on premium brands. These companies could launch similar products in this price range with some brand extensions and so on.
The State government is insisting that the policy changes will fetch in more revenue, encourage local industry and create new jobs. MML category is expected to fetch additional excise revenue of Rs. 3,000 crores.

Maharashtra Made Liquor (MML) Guidelines Announced to Boost Local Industry

In a move aimed at reviving underutilised liquor manufacturing units and offering consumers more affordable choices, the Maharashtra Government has formally introduced a new category of alcoholic beverage—Maharashtra Made Liquor (MML). The decision, approved by the State Cabinet in July, has now been formalised through a Government Resolution (GR) amending the Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1963.

The policy positions MML as a distinct sub-category under the Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) framework. To qualify, the liquor must be grain-based and produced using rectified spirit sourced exclusively within Maharashtra.

One of the biggest attractions for producers and consumers is the reduced excise duty, 270% for MML compared to 450% for IMFL. At an assumed manufacturing cost of ₹400 per litre, IMFL retails at roughly ₹2,200 (including ₹1,800 in excise), while MML is expected to cost around ₹1,480 (with ₹1,080 excise), making it about ₹700 cheaper per litre. The government has set a minimum retail price of ₹148 for a 180 ml bottle of MML, compared to ₹205 for IMFL and ₹80 for country liquor.

Under the new guidelines, MML manufacturers must have their registered head office in Maharashtra; maintain at least 25% state-resident shareholding; avoid producing or marketing MML outside the state; and register their brands within one year. Third-party production is not allowed, though leasing of plant capacity is permitted if the facility remains dedicated to MML production. If sold outside Maharashtra or if rules are violated, the MML status will be revoked, the guidelines state.

Economic Impact

According to reports, Maharashtra currently has 48 licensed IMFL manufacturing units, but only 10 dominate production; many operate at minimal capacity just to retain their licences. The government hopes MML will revive idle plants and generate up to ₹3,000 crore in additional annual revenue. The move is part of wider excise reforms targeting ₹14,000 crore yearly collections through measures including AI-powered monitoring of production and sales; new divisional excise offices; revised duty structures, IMFL at 3× to 4.5× manufacturing cost (capped at ₹260/litre), country liquor up to ₹205 per proof litre; and higher licence fees for FL-2 (retail) and FL-3 (bars) outlets.

In 2024-25, Maharashtra excise revenue stood at ₹25,467.96 crore. Of the six excise regions, Nashik region (Nashik, Nandurbar, Dhule and Jalgaon) earned ₹6,186.82 crore; followed by Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar region (Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Beed, Jalna, and Dharashiv) at ₹5,995.07 crore; Pune region (Pune, Ahilyanagar and Sholapur) at ₹5,809.79 crore; Thane region (Mumbai City, Mumbai suburbs, Thane, Palghar and Raigad) at ₹4,513.02 crore; Kolhapur Greater Region (Kolhapur, Satara, Sangli, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurga) at ₹1,265.21 crore; Nagpur region (Nagpur, Wardha, Bhandara, Gondia, Chandrapur and Gadchiroli) at ₹874.43 crore; Nanded region (Parbhani, Latur, Nanded and Hingoli) at ₹592.73 crore; and Amravati region (Amravati, Buldhana, Akola, Washim and Yavatmal) at ₹230.09 crore.

Unlike IMFL’s foreign-style blends, MML will feature simple, traditional flavours such as orange, cumin and herbs. Popular varieties are expected to include Santra, Chandni and Sugandhi. Packaging is expected to be basic, in bottles or sachets and to be labelled “For sale only in Maharashtra”. Distribution will focus on rural and semi-urban markets, though MML will also be available in urban centres. Production is said to be undertaken by state-run units, cooperative sugar factories, and private distilleries.

By creating a regulated, lower-cost option, the government hopes MML will help curb illicit liquor trade and reduce consumption of illicit brews.