Tag Archives: Excise Duty

Taxes could affect Indian Alcobev Industry

High taxation significantly burdens the Indian alcohol industry by increasing production costs, impacting profitability, and potentially driving consumers towards illicit alternatives. While GST doesn’t directly tax alcohol, increased taxes on input materials and logistics contribute to higher retail prices. This, coupled with state-specific excise duties and other levies, leads to a complex and fragmented market with varying prices and access points.

Indian alcohol market is estimated to be valued at 60.11 bn in 2025 and is expected to reach USD 101.10 bn in 2032, exhibiting compound annual growth (CAGR) 0f 7.7% from 2025 to 2032.

India’s alcoholic beverage industry faces regulatory hurdles like liquor bans and high taxation, impacting revenue and market share. Despite these challenges, the industry is projected to grow significantly, driven by premiumisation and evolving consumer preferences.

High taxation, particularly state-level excise duties and other levies, significantly burdens the Indian alcohol industry, impacting both producers and consumers. The industry contends with high tax burdens, with taxes often comprising 65-80% of the final retail price. This complex taxation structure, including state excise duties, VAT, and various fees, restricts financial flexibility and profitability.

In addition, the industry is hobbled by significant compliance overheads and a fragmented distribution ecosystem, where regulatory variations across states create logistical inefficiencies and increased costs. The working capital cycle is often elongated due to delayed payments from distributors and high inventory carrying costs, disproportionately affecting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). For these players, who typically operate on EBITDA margins as low as 10–12%, any downward pressure on pricing can be economically unsustainable.

Indian spirits—particularly whisky, rum, and country liquor—have only a marginal share in global markets. According to data from the Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA), India exported alcoholic beverages worth USD 322 million in FY 2022–23, with Indian-made foreign liquor (IMFL) comprising a major portion. In comparison, the UK exported over £6.2 billion worth of whisky alone in 2022, highlighting the asymmetry in export capacities. The entry of global players with deep pockets, established branding, and premium positioning will make it impossible for Indian brands to compete against them and scale sustainably or capture premium market share. This reduced market share could ultimately lead to downsizing, plant closures, and stagnation in rural supply chains that depend on the sector for income. If local manufacturers lose market share, states could face a decline in excise revenue and employment generation.

Tax increases on alcoholic beverages can negatively impact the alcobev industry in several ways. They lead to higher prices for consumers, potentially reducing demand, and can also increase the costs for producers due to taxes on inputs. Furthermore, tax increases can lead to a decrease in sales volume, impacting the industry’s revenue and potentially leading to job losses.

Reduced Demand and Sales Volume: Higher taxes translate to increased prices for consumers, which can make alcoholic beverages less affordable, particularly for budget-conscious consumers.

This price sensitivity can lead to a decrease in the quantity of alcohol purchased, impacting sales volume for manufacturers and retailers. Some consumers might switch to cheaper brands or even substitute with other alcoholic products, impacting specific segments of the industry.

Increased Production Costs: Even if not directly taxed, the production process of alcoholic beverages involves various inputs like bottles, labels, and packaging materials, which are subject to taxes like GST. The cost of these inputs can rise due to higher taxes, increasing the overall production cost for manufacturers.

This cost pressure can be particularly challenging for smaller or craft producers who may have less financial flexibility to absorb these increases.

Impact on Revenue and Employment: Reduced sales volume and increased production costs can significantly impact the industry’s revenue and profitability. This can lead to potential job losses in the manufacturing, distribution, and retail sectors of the alcobev industry.

The industry might also face challenges in terms of cash flow and working capital, especially when dealing with tax refunds for input costs.

Potential for Unintended Consequences: Some studies suggest that higher taxes may lead to increased illicit production and sale of alcohol to avoid taxation, which can pose public health risks and further impact legitimate businesses. Consumers may also resort to cheaper alternatives or reduce consumption in other areas to afford alcohol, potentially impacting other industries.

While the industry may argue that tax increases do not reduce alcohol-related harm, some research suggests that price increases can lead to reduced consumption, especially among heavy drinkers and young people.

Industry Arguments: The alcoholic beverage industry often argues that tax increases unfairly burden the industry and consumers, and may not be effective in reducing alcohol-related harm. They may also highlight the potential negative impact on employment and tourism, particularly in areas where the industry is a significant contributor to the local economy.

The industry may also argue that other measures, such as public awareness campaigns and responsible drinking initiatives, can be more effective in addressing alcohol-related issues.

Policy Considerations: Policymakers need to consider the potential economic and social impacts of tax increases on the alcobev industry when formulating policies. Balancing the need to generate revenue and address alcohol-related harms with the potential negative consequences for the industry and consumers is crucial. Consultation with the industry, public health experts, and consumers can help to develop more effective and balanced policies.

Overall, while higher taxes on alcoholic beverages can be a tool to address public health concerns and generate revenue, they can also pose significant challenges for the alcobev industry and potentially lead to unintended consequences. A careful and balanced approach is necessary when considering tax policy changes in this sector.

Maharashtra Government Hikes Taxes on Liquor; Dearer for the Consumer

  • CIABC urges government to reconsider hike
  • CIABC says hike will disrupt the market, erode competitiveness of national brands
  • May lead to dumping from neighbouring States

The Maharashtra cabinet, chaired by Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, on June 10 approved the Excise Department’s proposal to increase duties on Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL), country liquor and also premium liquor brands. The hike in excise duties is expected to boost the coffers of the state government by about Rs. 14,000 crore.

As per the announcement, the excise duty on IMFL (with a declared production cost up to ₹260 per bulk litre) from 3% to 4.5% of the production cost. The excise duty on country liquor will go up from Rs.180 to Rs. 205 per proof litre. The premium foreign liquor brands have seen the most hike, with a new rate set to bring the minimum retail price to Rs 360.

The Cabinet also approved the department’s proposal to introduce a category ‘Maharashtra Made Liquor’ (MML) to include grain-based spirits produced by local manufacturers. The idea behind this proposal, it said, was to encourage local manufacturing. The MML manufacturers are required to register their brands under the ‘MML’ category.

The excise department had formed a high-level study group which toured other states to understand the excise policies, the distillery operations, distribution etc and recommend the best for Maharashtra.  Going by the recommendations, the department has also approved the creation of an integrated control unit powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) to monitor distilleries, liquor manufacturers, and wholesale vendors. Additionally, a restructured administrative framework for the department has been sanctioned, which includes the offices of the Additional Superintendent for Mumbai Suburban, Thane, Pune, Nashik, Nagpur, and Ahilyanagar districts.

The Chief Minister’s office said “These reforms are a result of an extensive review of excise policies in other states which focused on tax structures, licensing efficiency, and measures to combat evasion. The objective of the new policy is not only to boost state revenue but also to curb illicit trade and foster a more transparent and regulated liquor market across Maharashtra.”

Revised minimum retail prices 

The state government has issued the revised minimum retail prices for 180 ml bottles.

  • Country liquor: Rs 80
  • Maharashtra Made Liquor (MML): Rs 148
  • IMFL: Rs 205 (previous Rs. 120 to Rs. 150)
  • Premium foreign liquor: Rs 360 (previously Rs. 330)

Reforms in Licensing and Staffing

The Cabinet has also approved reforms in liquor licensing:

Sealed Foreign Liquor Sale Licenses (FL-2) and Hotel/Restaurant Licenses (FL-3) can now be operated on a lease basis (Conducting Agreement)

An additional annual fee of 15% for FL-2 and 10% for FL-3 licenses will be charged

To support these changes and ensure effective implementation, the Cabinet has sanctioned the creation of 1,223 new posts, including 744 new positions and 479 supervisory roles in the State Excise Department.

These comprehensive reforms are part of the government’s broader strategy to strengthen the department and increase revenue through systematic regulation of the liquor trade.

It must be mentioned that the state is facing a financial crunch due to the implementation of many welfare schemes particularly the ‘Ladli Bahin Yojana’ which pays eligible women Rs. 1,500 per month.  

The state government is expected to table the relevant bill during the upcoming session of the state legislature.

 Presently, it is said that Karnataka levies the highest liquor taxes in the country, with an 83 per cent cess on the actual price. In addition, the state government introduced a 5 per cent additional excise duty on certain products last month. As a result, Bengaluru has become the most expensive metro city for alcohol in India.

In neighbouring Telangana, the state government  in May issued an order raising the retail price of select liquor brands by ₹10 for a quarter bottle (180 ml), ₹20 for a half bottle (360 ml), and ₹40 for a full bottle (750 ml).

Almost all the states, barring those having prohibition, treat the liquor industry as the cash cow and keep raising taxes as and when the government is in need of funds.

CIABC Opposes Steep Increase in Excise Duty on IMFL

Expressing grave concern over steep increase in Excise Duty on IMFL by up to 50% by the Maharashtra Government, the Confederation of Indian Alcoholic Beverage Companies (CIABC) has urged the state government to rethink and reconsider such a huge hike as it could trigger serious consequences. The CIABC has urged the state government to immediately hold deliberations with all stakeholders “to arrive at a balanced, data-driven, and sustainable course of action that protects both revenue interests and the long-term viability of the IMFL sector in Maharashtra”.

Stating that the CIABC has already written to the Maharashtra government urging to start a consultative process with all stakeholders before releasing any final gazette notification, Mr Anant S Iyer, Director General of the apex body of the Indian Alcoholic Beverage Industry, underlined that this steep hike in excise is projected to push Maximum Retail Prices (MRPs) up by as much as 85%, a step that could severely disrupt the market, erode the competitiveness of national brands, and jeopardize the availability of legitimate alcoholic beverages in Maharashtra.

“Such an unprecedented escalation in duties poses a serious deterrence to consumer access of established and reputed brands, compelling a shift toward lower-category products. This poses a serious threat to the stability of the IMFL industry in the State…such a move will have a far-reaching adverse impact,” Mr Iyer said in a statement.

The hike, he said, would lead to a steep and abrupt increase in MRPs (maximum retail price), destabililsing consumer accessibility and purchasing power, particularly within the mass-market segment which caters to the common man. This will lead to a significant drop in legal sales volumes, overlooking the interest of industry and its substantial investment in the state. It will also endanger the employment of people engaged in the entire value chain from farm to consumer.

Mr Iyer warned that higher MRPs often create a vacuum filled by illegal operators. Past experiences show that pricing arbitrage fosters regional imbalances, encouraging the spread of illicit and unsafe liquor and counterfeits of popular brands—posing a major public health risk and leading to further revenue leakage.

Porous Borders, may lead to Dumping

Noting that this move will also result in increased stock dumping from neighbouring states, the CIABC DG said Maharashtra shares borders with states that are porous. These states have similar brands which have lower MRPs for IMFL. Any additional price escalation will trigger large-scale dumping (exfiltration) from these states, resulting in illicit inflows that damage legitimate trade and erode the State’s tax base. Maharashtra has always ensured minimal impact of such occurrences by ensuring competitive pricing vide neighbouring states till now.

Mr Iyer further said the retail price structure must align with consumer affordability. The proposed price increase risks shifting consumers toward lower-tax categories, undermining premium and mid-tier segments. Such behavioural shifts could dilute revenue contributions from higher-margin IMFL products.

IMFL Accounts for 60% of Excise Revenue

The IMFL industry contributes approximately 60% of the total Excise Revenue of the State. Furthermore, the Excise Duty collected from a single case of IMFL is equivalent to that from four cases of beer, underscoring the critical importance of this category. Duty increase on IMFL, without corresponding changes for a category such as beer will create an uneven playing field and distort category dynamics leading to possible adverse impact on revenue. The CIABC has highlighted to the Maharashtra government that while the intent behind the proposed hike may be to enhance revenue collections by Rs.14,000 crore, the actual outcome may be contrary- driven by declining sales, rising illicit trade, and border leakages. The long-term impact could be deeply detrimental, not only for industry and employment, but also for public safety and overall state revenues.

Delhi Earned ₹5,000 Crore from Tax On Liquor

The newly elected Delhi government run by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has said that due to the implementation of the new liquor policy under the AAP from November 2021 to August 2022, only private shops were allowed to sell alcohol. It said that over ₹5,000 crore was collected from taxes on liquor in the current financial year.

Responding to a question asked by BJP MLA Abhay Verma in the Delhi Assembly, the government said it earned revenue of ₹5,068.92 crore from excise duty and VAT (value added tax) on the sale of liquor in the financial year 2024-25, till February.

The question comes at a time when the BJP has continued to attack the AAP over the alleged liquor policy scam. Former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his deputy Manish Sisodia were among the AAP leaders who were jailed in connection with the alleged scam.

The new Rekha Gupta-led BJP government reported that ₹5,164 crore was collected in taxes on alcohol in 2023-24, ₹5,547 crore in 2022-23 and ₹5,487 crore in 2021-22. The government stated that due to the implementation of the new liquor policy in Delhi under the AAP from November 2021 to August 2022, only private shops were allowed to sell alcohol. However, when the old liquor policy was reimplemented in September 2022, government liquor stores were permitted to operate.

In 2023-24, 21.27 crore litres of alcohol were sold in Delhi, which translates to 5.82 lakh litres per day, while the figure for 2022-23 was 25.84 crore litres.